Thursday, November 8, 2007

Up to here with pseuds

I visited this site recently, referred to me by a friend of mine, where Anurag Kashyap (I am assuming it was really him and not someone posing as him) had written about this reverse snobbishness that many 'educated' Hindi film viewers are wont to, when they claim that they watch Hindi movies only for the 'entertainment'. These guys go ga-ga over a Tarkovsky or, if you are less pseud, over Tarantino, but find a remotely cerebral Hindi film too 'arty-farty'.

I am not sure I had completely understood what Kashyap was saying, but now, after having read what many people have to say about No Smoking, I think I have begun to get an idea. Though I understand that there is a chance of people honestly not liking the film, in most cases, the person seems to come up with the most laughable reasons for it.

A friend, for instance, was cribbing about missing good ol' fluffy Hindi flicks while talking about the disenchanting seriousness of No Smoking. Some people revel in the idea that Hindi flicks are supposed to be these no-brainer song-and-dance melodramatic features, where one can take some refuge after having watched a little too much of Nouvelle Vague or some other such chic sounding cinema.

I can't even begin to laugh at these people. What is unfortunate is that many of these people claim to be authorities on cinema. Having watched more movies than your peers, or managing to think of bigger words when writing a stupid blog-post does not make you one, unfortunately.

1 Comment:

Robert Frust said...

I think running people down because they don't like a particular 'intellectual' film in Hindi and extrapolating that they must be snobs or reverse-snobs betrays your own prejudices.
It's a lot like the surprisingly common view among atheists that all those who are theists are intolerant and hence worthy only of ridicule, the atheists forgetting in the process that their own view makes them intolerant.
Apart from your obvious delight at the intellectual limitations of those unable to appreciate all that is great in "No Smoking", your entire argument is based around the fact that such people are conformists who like what is convenient to admit liking - spectacular/melodramamtic Hindi films and safe bets like European movies. Everyone who doesn't like "No Smoking" must be someone without an independent opinion (and a movie racist and stupid to boot) and everyone who does is automatically admissible to the select club of the true believers. This argument is itself racist, or reverse-racist if you prefer. One is allowed to not want to watch French New Wave but one loses one's credentials if "No Smoking" doesn't excite.
And about the having watched more movies than peers argument, you ought to look at the amount of name-dropping you've done in your rant to bolster your own arguments.
PS: Did you seriously believe I thought the woman you think is criminally beautiful is someone on orkut?

Template Designed by Douglas Bowman - Updated to Beta by: Blogger Team
Modified for 3-Column Layout by Hoctro